Will be Relevance of Concept?


“Technology in the long-run is irrelevant”. That is definitely what a customer with mine told me as i made a appearance to him in terms of a new product. I had been dealing with the product’s attributes and benefits and even listed “state-of-the-art technology” or something fot it effect, as one ones. That is when he made his / her statement. I had any idea later that he was basically correct, at least from the context of how As i used “Technology” with my presentation. But We began thinking about if he could be right with other contexts likewise.

What is Technology?

Merriam-Webster defines it as:

just one

a: the program of knowledge especially in a selected area: engineering 3 <medical technology>

b: a capabilities given by the request of knowledge <a car’s fuel-saving technology>


: a manner for accomplishing a task mainly using technical operations, methods, or know-how


: the particular aspects of a particular arena of endeavor <educational technology>

Wikipedia defines it as:

Solutions (from Greek τέχνη, techne, “art, proficiency, cunning of hand”; and -λογία, -logia[1]) is a making, modification, application, and knowledge of applications, machines, techniques, work, systems, and strategies of organization, in order to address a problem, improve a new preexisting solution to problems, achieve a goal, cope with an applied input/output relation or perform specific function. It can possibly refer to the collection about such tools, like machinery, modifications, bouquets and procedures. Engineering significantly affect people as well as other animal species’ ability to control together with adapt to their healthy environments. The term may be applied generally or even specific areas: for example construction technology, health technology, and information solutions.

Both definitions involve the same thing – plan and usage.

Technologies is an enabler

Most people mistakenly believe it is technologies which drives originality. Yet from the classifications above, that is certainly not the case. It is business which defines development and technology which often enables innovation. Visualize the classic “Build a greater mousetrap” example tutored in most business educational facilities. You might have the technological innovation to build a better mousetrap, but if you have no these rodents or the old mousetrap works well, there is no chance and then the engineering to build a better just one becomes irrelevant. Conversely, if you are overrun with rodents then the opportunity prevails to innovate a specific thing using your technology.

A different example, one of which I am intimately well known, are consumer electronics international companies. I’ve been regarding both those that followed and those that was unable. Each possessed one of a kind leading edge technologies. The was opportunity. Those which failed could not chose the opportunity to develop a purposeful innovation using their technological know-how. In fact to survive, they then had to morph frequently into something completely different and if they were fortuitous they could take advantage of derivatives of their original systems. More often than not, the original concept wound up in the tidbit heap. Technology, so, is an enabler do you know ultimate value offrande is to make improvements to our live. In order to be relevant, it requires to be used to create revolutions that are driven by means of opportunity.

Technology for a competitive advantage?

Many businesses list a solutions as one of their cut-throat advantages. Is this logical? In some cases yes, but also from most cases no .

Technological innovation develops along a couple paths – the evolutionary path as well as a revolutionary path.

An innovative technology is one which will enables new companies or enables ways to problems that were recently not possible. Semiconductor technologies is a good example. But not only did it spawn unique industries and solutions, but it spawned different revolutionary technologies tutorial transistor technology, bundled circuit technology, processor technology. All which in turn provide many of the goods and services we consume currently. But is semiconductor technology a reasonably competitive advantage? Looking at how many semiconductor companies that you can get today (with brand new ones forming just about every day), I’d declare not. How about micro-pocessor technology? Again, number Lots of microprocessor corporations out there. How about quad core microprocessor technological innovation? Not as many companies, but the truth is have Intel, AMD, ARM, and a coordinator of companies making custom quad main processors (Apple, The samsung company, Qualcomm, etc). Consequently again, not much of an competitive advantage. Level of competition from competing technological innovation and easy access to IP mitigates the thought of competitive advantage of any specific particular technology. Robot vs iOS is an effective example of how that works. Both os’s are derivatives associated with UNIX. Apple implemented their technology to help introduce iOS as well as gained an early promote advantage. However , Research engines, utilizing their variant regarding Unix (a competitive technology), caught up somewhat quickly. The reasons due to lie not inside underlying technology, however in how the products thanks to by those engineering were brought to marketplace (free vs . walled garden, etc . ) and the differences in typically the strategic visions of company.

Evolutionary engineering is one which incrementally builds upon the basic revolutionary technology. Although by it’s very dynamics, the incremental adjust is easier for a player to match or leapfrog. Take for example cellular cellphone technology. Firm V introduced 4-G products prior to Corporation A and while this could have had a short name advantage, as soon as Provider A introduced all their 4G products, outstanding due to technology gone. The consumer went back to selecting Company A or possibly Company V determined price, service, insurance policy coverage, whatever, but not depending on technology. Thus technological know-how might have been relevant for the forseeable future, but in the long term, evolved into irrelevant.

In today’s world, modern advances tend to quickly become commoditized, and within any kind of particular technology lays the seeds involving its own death.

Technology’s Relevance

This article had been written from the would-be of an end customer. Originating from a developer/designer standpoint stuff get murkier. Often the further one is taken from the technology, often the less relevant it has become. To a developer, the exact technology can resemble a product. An making it possible for product, but an item non-etheless, and thus it can be highly relevant. Bose uses a proprietary indicate processing technology allow products that connect with a set of market prerequisites and thus the systems and what it makes it possible for is relevant to them. People are more concerned with the way it sounds, what’s the value, what’s the quality, and so forth, and not so much having how it is obtained, thus the concept used is much significantly less relevant to them.

Not long ago, I was involved in attorney at law on Google+ with regards to the new Motorola A phone. A lot of the persons on those articles and reviews slammed the phone meant for various reasons — price, locked trunk loader, etc . There initially were also plenty of hits on the fact that it decided not to have a quad-core brand like the S4 or even HTC One which ended up priced similarly. These people failed to grasp is always that whether the manufacturer utilized 1, 2, 5, or 8 durillon in the end makes not any difference as long as the unit can deliver a demanding (or even good class) feature placed, functionality, price, and also user experience. The apple iphone is one of the most profitable phones ever made, and yet it extends on a dual-core processor. The item still delivers among the finest user experiences available. The features that are made it possible for by the technology usually are what are relevant to the individual, not the solutions itself.

The adéquation of technology consequently , is as an enabler, not as a product attribute or a competitive advantages, or any myriad of other considerations – an enabler. Looking at the Google android operating system, it is an extraordinary piece of software technology, nevertheless Google gives it gone. Why? Because stand alone, it does nothing with regard to Google. Giving it aside allows other companies to apply their expertise to make products and services which then stand for enablers for Google’s products and services. To Search engines, that’s where the realistic value is.

Carefully of or admission to a technology is barely important for what it means that you can do – develop innovations which resolve problems. That is the actual relevance of technologies.

Related posts